Tips for Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Supply Chain – Part 1

By: Alexandra Kueller

BSR recently published a report that focused on targeting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Chinese suppliers in hopes of reducing said emissions. With looking to assist global companies in reducing GHG emissions, BSR’s report can be expanded and applied to suppliers all around the world.

We went ahead and broke down the report into two sections, with first part focusing on laying the foundation for successful GHG reductions with your suppliers. The two points below – Demonstrate Commitment and Provide Direction – are key opportunities to help overcome challenges your business might face when trying to reduce GHGs with your suppliers:

Demonstrate Commitment

All too often, collaboration among buyers and suppliers can become sidetracked when one party (or both) is too focused on short-term issues. Take the lead and show that you are committed to the long-term. Two ways of doing so are by ensuring internal alignment & capability and by signaling long-term climate engagement.

In order to move forward with reducing emissions with your suppliers, you first need to make sure that everyone within your company is on the same page. Some companies, like HP for example, aligned its supplier sustainability team with its broader supply chain cooperation to help ensure that everyone had the same goal across the board.

According to BSR, companies that are making progress in long-term climate engagement tend to have the following views:

  • Climate is seen as both an urgent and long-term issue that needs to be taken seriously
  • There is a need for integrating energy and climate considerations into a company’s business strategy and plan
  • Actions are connected and reinforced through programs, policies, etc. to help reach business goals
  • All offices – corporate, regional – are aligned to offer the same, organized, and clear message

So don’t be afraid to ruffle a few feathers and make some changes!

Provide Direction

How many times have you been working on a project with multiple people and no one’s ideas or vision seem to line up the same? This situation is also common among companies and their suppliers when it comes to reducing GHG emissions. It is important to provide direction, that way there is little to no confusion between you and your supplier (and that way you can start seeing some reduction results!).

In order for your company to provide the best direction possible, it is imperative that you find the best possible framework for your company. Once you have the best framework, you can start your plan of attack: do you go for the “low-hanging fruit” or do you want to have a goal that will take more time?

Once you figure out what direction your company is taking, it is also important for you to find suppliers that are willing to take your direction and make the most out of it. According to the BSR report, here are the three “A’s” to look for in supplier carbon management:

  • Ambition – management commitment, previous energy work, willingness to collaborate
  • Actionable information – desired potential actions, progress on potential actions, sector-specific energy priorities
  • Ability – energy management experience, data collection capability, energy management team

No time is better than the present to start mapping out where you want your company to go and provide the direction that will help you reduce those GHGs!

Look for the second part in our next blog, but if you want to learn more about sustainable supply chains, you can do so by reading our white paper.

7 Tips for Achieving Sustainability Consensus

Ask a dozen people about their sustainability priorities, and you'll get a dozen answers. Just kidding -- you'll probably get a hundred answers, since people rarely restrict themselves to just one priority. So how do you narrow down the options enough to move forward with a plan? Is sustainability consensus even possible?

Getting People to Say Yes When Everyone Isn't on Board, by team development consultant Dana Brownlee, offers seven ways to move closer to consensus. While her article isn't targeted specifically for sustainability, it's easy to see the possibilities for sustainability professionals.

  1. Set guidelines (about the decision-making process)
  2. Separate and clarify (so you *really* understand any disagreements)
  3. Get others involved (to ensure you have enough information to make a good decision)
  4. Change things up (to get people out of their usual ruts)
  5. Have a group decision (using collaborative decision-making techniques)
  6. Ensure it isn't personal (and take personality conflicts offline)

Have you tried any of these approaches? Which ones work best for your team? At SSC, we insist on setting decision-making guidelines early (#1), but we could probably use some work on changing things up (#4). Maybe our next planning session needs to be in a picnic setting!

Thanks to 2degrees for publishing our article!

Have more ideas to add to the list?  Leave a comment or drop us a line!

Creating a Better Understanding in the Sustainability Reporting World

By: Alexandra Kueller

Recently, the SSC team attended US SIF's annual conference in Washington DC which focused on sustainable and responsible investment. The discussion topics covered a wide range of issues – from finance and investing to sustainability. One of the discussions that piqued our interest was a conversation on measuring and reporting sustainability factors in portfolio performance.

Below are some takeaways from the discussion that we thought you might find interesting:

Is sustainability reporting truly an “apples to apples” comparison?

  •  When reading over sustainability reports, it is very easy to take Company A and try and compare it to Company B. But are those two companies really on the same playing field? Often, different industries will report different metrics or benchmarking goals. It is important to remember NOT to try and extrapolate data and project it.

Harmonization is needed

  •  Take a look at the sustainability reports out there. Do you see any similarities? There’s not a lot of commonality between reports, which can further cause us to blindly compare reports. By using well known platforms, such as GRI and CDP, it allows for more harmonization between reports.

Move beyond disclosure to context

  • If you want a strong sustainability report, it is key to move past just the “disclosure” phase and move into the “context” phase. Providing information about the metrics and data will give the report the details needed to beef up and strengthen your report.

Understand that change is incremental

  •  Everyone knows that change does not happen overnight. So why do we find ourselves hoping for dramatic change in data from year to year in sustainability reporting? Yes, we all want to see change, but if you enter with the right mindset – true change can take between 3-5 years – this can help create a better framework for your reporting (and allow yourself to set more appropriate goals!).

You can read more about our time at the US SIF conference here.